Frequency of Dimethyl Fumarate-Induced Lymphopenia among Omani Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

Objectives: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is known to cause lymphopenia when used to treat patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, research on DMF therapy in the Arab world, especially in Oman, is scarce. This study aimed to analyse the prevalence of lymphopenia among Omani patients with MS and their reasons for discontinuing DMF therapy. Methods: In this retrospective study, the medical records of Omani patients with MS who were treated using DMF at two tertiary hospitals in Muscat, Oman, from February 2017 to February 2023 were reviewed. Their demographic, clinical and laboratory data were retrieved and analysed. Absolute lymphocyte count values at baseline and at the last follow-up, as well as the reasons for discontinuing DMF therapy, were collected. Descriptive and inferential statistical techniques were used for data analysis. Binary-logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for DMF-induced lymphopenia. Results: A total of 64 Omani patients with MS were included in this study. The majority of the study participants (n = 40; 63%) were female. All included patients started DMF therapy at the mean age of 33 ± 7.7 years. After administration of DMF, 14 (21.9%) patients developed grades 1-3 of lymphopenia. The DMF therapy was discontinued for 23 (36.0%) patients, mainly in response to adverse events or confirmed pregnancy. Female gender was the only significant predictor of DMF-induced lymphopenia (P = 0.037). Conclusions: Most Omani patients with MS had mild lymphopenia (grades 1-2). Early adverse events and pregnancy were the main reasons provided for discontinuing DMF therapy.

Visualizing the target estimand in comparative effectiveness studies with multiple treatments.

Aim: Comparative effectiveness research using real-world data often involves pairwise propensity score matching to adjust for confounding bias. We show that corresponding treatment effect estimates may have limited external validity, and propose two visualization tools to clarify the target estimand. Materials & methods: We conduct a simulation study to demonstrate, with bivariate ellipses and joy plots, that differences in covariate distributions across treatment groups may affect the external validity of treatment effect estimates. We showcase how these visualization tools can facilitate the interpretation of target estimands in a case study comparing the effectiveness of teriflunomide (TERI), dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and natalizumab (NAT) on manual dexterity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Results: In the simulation study, estimates of the treatment effect greatly differed depending on the target population. For example, when comparing treatment B with C, the estimated treatment effect (and respective standard error) varied from -0.27 (0.03) to -0.37 (0.04) in the type of patients initially receiving treatment B and C, respectively. Visualization of the matched samples revealed that covariate distributions vary for each comparison and cannot be used to target one common treatment effect for the three treatment comparisons. In the case study, the bivariate distribution of age and disease duration varied across the population of patients receiving TERI, DMF or NAT. Although results suggest that DMF and NAT improve manual dexterity at 1 year compared with TERI, the effectiveness of DMF versus NAT differs depending on which target estimand is used. Conclusion: Visualization tools may help to clarify the target population in comparative effectiveness studies and resolve ambiguity about the interpretation of estimated treatment effects.

Final analysis of 379 pregnancy outcomes after exposure to dimethyl fumarate in a prospective international registry.

BACKGROUND: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) has a favorable benefit-risk profile treating people with multiple sclerosis and should be used in pregnant women only if the potential benefits outweigh potential risks to the fetus. OBJECTIVE: Assess pregnancy outcomes in a completed international registry (TecGistry) of women with MS exposed to DMF. METHODS: TecGistry included pregnant women with MS exposed to DMF, with data collected at enrollment, 6-7 months gestation, 4 weeks after estimated due date, and at postpartum weeks 4, 12, and 52. Outcomes included live births, gestational size, pregnancy loss, ectopic/molar pregnancies, birth defects, and infant/maternal death. RESULTS: Of 397 enrolled, median (range) age was 32 years (19-43). Median (range) gestational week at enrollment was 10 (0-39) and at first DMF exposure was 1 (0-13). Median (range) duration of gestational DMF exposure was 5 weeks (0-40). Fifteen (3.8%) spontaneous abortions occurred. Of 360 (89.1%) live births, 323 were full term and 37 were premature. One neonatal death and no maternal deaths occurred. Adjudicator-confirmed EUROCAT birth defects were found in 2.2%. CONCLUSION: DMF exposure during pregnancy did not adversely affect pregnancy outcomes; birth defects, preterm birth, and spontaneous abortion were in line with rates from the general population.

Discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis - a nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Adherence is a prerequisite for the efficacy of any drug, and previous studies have shown that non-adherence is associated with disease activity and increased health care cost in multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this study was to investigate rates and reasons for discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) among people with MS on a national level and differences between clinics in Denmark. METHODS: This was a nationwide, registry and population study of patients treated with DMF. We calculated standard residuals (SR) demonstrate differences between clinics. For survival analysis regarding discontinuation rates and discontinuation due to specific AEs we used log-rank test Cox-proportional hazards and plotted Kaplan-Meier graphics. RESULTS: We included 2,448 people with MS, treated with DMF from 2013 to 2020. Average treatment duration was 26 months (5,382 treatment years). 49.2 % of patients who initiated treatment with DMF (n = 1205) were continuously treated. Reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (54.5 %, n = 656), active disease (26.1 %, n = 315), pregnancy (9.4 %, n = 113) or other reasons (13.2 %, n = 159). We compared SR to the mean regarding reasons for discontinuation and found significant differences between sites regarding gastrointestinal adverse events, flushing and lymphopenia. Discontinuation due to all adverse events, flushing and lymphopenia were more frequent in female than male patients. CONCLUSION: In this population-based study, we found major differences between the MS clinics in rates and reason for discontinuation of DMF. Our results suggest that management strategies during DMF treatment can reduce discontinuation rates.

Diroximel fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: Final safety and efficacy results from the phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 study.

BACKGROUND: Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is approved for adults with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in Europe and for relapsing forms of MS in the United States. DRF and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) yield bioequivalent exposure of the active metabolite monomethyl fumarate. Prior studies indicated fewer gastrointestinal (GI)-related adverse events (AEs) with DRF compared with DMF. OBJECTIVE: To report final outcomes from EVOLVE-MS-1. METHODS: EVOLVE-MS-1 was an open-label, 96-week, phase 3 study assessing DRF safety, tolerability, and efficacy in patients with RRMS. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability; efficacy endpoints were exploratory. RESULTS: Overall, 75.7% (800/1057) of patients completed the study; median exposure was 1.8 (range: 0.0-2.0) years. AEs occurred in 938 (88.7%) patients, mostly of mild (28.9%) or moderate (50.3%) severity. DRF was discontinued due to AEs in 85 (8.0%) patients, with < 2% discontinuing due to GI or flushing/flushing-related AEs. At Week 96, mean number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions was significantly reduced from baseline (72.7%; p < 0.0001); adjusted annualized relapse rate was 0.13 (95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.15). CONCLUSION: DRF was generally well tolerated over 2 years, with few discontinuations due to AEs; radiological measures indicated decreased disease activity from baseline. These outcomes support DRF as a treatment option in patients with RRMS.

Dimethyl Fumarate or Teriflunomide for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Meta-analysis of Post-marketing Studies.

In the absence of head-to-head comparison trials, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of two largely prescribed oral platform disease-modifying treatments for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, namely, dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and teriflunomide (TRF). We searched scientific databases to identify real-world studies reporting a direct comparison of DMF versus TRF. We fitted inverse-variance weighted meta-analyses with random effects models to estimate the risk ratio (RR) of relapse, confirmed disability worsening (CDW), and treatment discontinuation. Quantitative synthesis was accomplished on 14 articles yielding 11,889 and 8133 patients treated with DMF and TRF, respectively, with a follow-up ranging from 1 to 2.8 years. DMF was slightly more effective than TRF in reducing the short-term relapse risk (RR = 0.92, p = 0.01). Meta-regression analyses showed that such between-arm difference tends to fade in studies including younger patients and a higher proportion of treatment-naïve subjects. There was no difference between DMF and TRF on the short-term risk of CDW (RR = 0.99, p = 0.69). The risk of treatment discontinuation was similar across the two oral drugs (RR = 1.02, p = 0.63), but it became slightly higher with DMF than with TRF (RR = 1.07, p = 0.007) after removing one study with a potential publication bias that altered the final pooled result, as also confirmed by a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. Discontinuation due to side effects and adverse events was reported more frequently with DMF than with TRF. Our findings suggest that DMF is associated with a lower risk of relapses than TRF, with more nuanced differences in younger naïve patients. On the other hand, TRF is associated with a lower risk of treatment discontinuation for side effects and adverse events.

Real-life outcomes for oral disease-modifying treatments of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: Adherence and adverse event profiles from Marmara University.

BACKGROUND: Disease-modifying treatments (DMT) are used to prevent future relapses and disability. High long-term adherence to treatment is important to achieve disease control. This study aims to investigate and compare adherence, adverse event (AE) profiles, and frequencies, main reasons for treatment discontinuation under Teriflunomide (TERI), Dimethyl Fumarate (DMF), and Fingolimod (FNG) for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients. This study is designed to explore patient-reported experiences in real-life settings. METHODS: Patients who were older than 18 years with a definite diagnosis of RRMS and no history of stem-cell transplantation were included. Outpatient clinic data files at the Neurology Department of Marmara University from June 2012 to June 2019 were examined retrospectively. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety MS patients were enrolled. 118 FNG, 51 DMF, 44 TERI treatment cycles were recorded. Time sincedisease onset, time since diagnosis, and treatment duration were significantly longer for FNG (p = 0.012, p = 0.004, p < 0.001). 72.8% of all the treatment cycles were continued. There was no significant difference in treatment continuity between the 3 DMT groups. The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation in order of frequency were adverse events, the progression of the disease, and the persistence of relapses. No significant difference was found for treatment discontinuation reasons. 32% of the patients reported at least one AE. 28% FNG, 49 % DMF, and 27.3% TERI using patients reported AEs. AEs were much more frequently reported for DMF (p = 0.015). The most common adverse events for each DMT were alopecia (n = 6, 13.6%) for TERI, flushing for DMF (n = 20, 39.2%), and persistent lymphopenia for FNG (n = 9, 7.6%). No severe or life-threatening AE was reported for DMF, one patient experienced pancreatitis under TERI, and 11 (9.3%) patients using FNG had to stop treatment due to serious or life-threatening AEs including cardiac adverse events, opportunistic infections, and dysplasia. DISCUSSION: Overall treatment discontinuation because of AEs is as low as 10.3% in this study. However, AEs are still the main reason for treatment drop-out.

Comparison Between Dimethyl Fumarate, Fingolimod, and Ocrelizumab After Natalizumab Cessation.

Importance: Natalizumab cessation is associated with a risk of rebound disease activity. It is important to identify the optimal switch disease-modifying therapy strategy after natalizumab to limit the risk of severe relapses. Objectives: To compare the effectiveness and persistence of dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, and ocrelizumab among patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) who discontinued natalizumab. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this observational cohort study, patient data were collected from the MSBase registry between June 15, 2010, and July 6, 2021. The median follow-up was 2.7 years. This was a multicenter study that included patients with RRMS who had used natalizumab for 6 months or longer and then were switched to dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, or ocrelizumab within 3 months after natalizumab discontinuation. Patients without baseline data were excluded from the analysis. Data were analyzed from May 24, 2022, to January 9, 2023. Exposures: Dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, and ocrelizumab. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were annualized relapse rate (ARR) and time to first relapse. Secondary outcomes were confirmed disability accumulation, disability improvement, and subsequent treatment discontinuation, with the comparisons for the first 2 limited to fingolimod and ocrelizumab due to the small number of patients taking dimethyl fumarate. The associations were analyzed after balancing covariates using an inverse probability of treatment weighting method. Results: Among 66 840 patients with RRMS, 1744 had used natalizumab for 6 months or longer and were switched to dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, or ocrelizumab within 3 months of natalizumab discontinuation. After excluding 358 patients without baseline data, a total of 1386 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.3 [10.6] years; 990 female [71%]) switched to dimethyl fumarate (138 [9.9%]), fingolimod (823 [59.4%]), or ocrelizumab (425 [30.7%]) after natalizumab. The ARR for each medication was as follows: ocrelizumab, 0.06 (95% CI, 0.04-0.08); fingolimod, 0.26 (95% CI, 0.12-0.48); and dimethyl fumarate, 0.27 (95% CI, 0.12-0.56). The ARR ratio of fingolimod to ocrelizumab was 4.33 (95% CI, 3.12-6.01) and of dimethyl fumarate to ocrelizumab was 4.50 (95% CI, 2.89-7.03). Compared with ocrelizumab, the hazard ratio (HR) of time to first relapse was 4.02 (95% CI, 2.83-5.70) for fingolimod and 3.70 (95% CI, 2.35-5.84) for dimethyl fumarate. The HR of treatment discontinuation was 2.57 (95% CI, 1.74-3.80) for fingolimod and 4.26 (95% CI, 2.65-6.84) for dimethyl fumarate. Fingolimod use was associated with a 49% higher risk for disability accumulation compared with ocrelizumab. There was no significant difference in disability improvement rates between fingolimod and ocrelizumab. Conclusion and Relevance: Study results show that among patients with RRMS who switched from natalizumab to dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, or ocrelizumab, ocrelizumab use was associated with the lowest ARR and discontinuation rates, and the longest time to first relapse.

Dimethyl fumarate induced Wells syndrome. A case report. / Síndrome de Wells secundario a dimetilfumarato. A propósito de un caso clínico.

INTRODUCTION: Wells syndrome, also known as eosinophilic cellulitis, is a rare dermatosis with approximately 200 cases previously described in the literature. Here, we present a case of a patient with multiple sclerosis with Wells syndrome induced by dimethyl fumarate (DMF). CASE REPORT: A 41-year-old Caucasian woman was treated with DMF in July 2021. One week later, she experienced itching on her upper and lower right arm, followed by the appearance of erythematous plaques covered with vesicles. The complete blood count showed an increased eosinophil count of up to 2,000 µL. The histological images demonstrated dermal eosinophil infiltration concordant with Wells syndrome. The clinical course was benign, with complete resolution of the lesions and normalization of the eosinophil count within four weeks. Administration of corticosteroids was not necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Eosinophilia is rare in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with DMF and usually does not require dosage adjustments. Although clinical manifestations of eosinophilia in these patients are very rare, it is important for practitioners to recognize the symptoms. Many neuroleptic drugs can induce eosinophilia and systemic symptoms; therefore, physicians must be aware of the risks associated with DMF and neuroleptic drugs, particularly for quetiapine, which contains fumarate.

TITLE: Síndrome de Wells secundario a dimetilfumarato. A propósito de un caso clínico.Introducción. El síndrome de Wells, también conocido como celulitis eosinofílica, es una rara dermatosis con aproximadamente 200 casos descritos en la bibliografía. Aquí presentamos un caso clínico de un paciente con esclerosis múltiple y síndrome de Wells secundario a dimetilfumarato (DMF). Caso clínico. Mujer de 41 años que en julio de 2021 inició el tratamiento con DMF. Una semana más tarde, comenzó con prurito en las extremidades derechas, seguido por la aparición de zonas eritematosas con vesículas. El hemograma mostró elevación del recuento de los eosinófilos hasta 2.000 µL. El estudio anatomopatológico evidenció un infiltrado eosinófilo a nivel de la dermis compatible con síndrome de Wells. La evolución clínica fue favorable, con resolución de las lesiones y normalización de la eosinofilia aproximadamente en cuatro semanas. No fue necesario administrar corticoesteroides. Conclusiones. La eosinofilia es rara en los pacientes con EM tratados con DMF y generalmente no precisa ajuste de dosis. A pesar de que las manifestaciones clínicas de la eosinofilia en estos pacientes sean raras, es importante que el médico reconozca los síntomas. Numerosos neurolépticos pueden causar eosinofilia y síntomas sistémicos; por lo tanto, los facultativos deben conocer los riesgos de la asociación entre DMF y neurolépticos, en particular por la quetiapina, que contiene fumarato.

Sofa dermatitis: Value of patch test with 2-(thiocyanomethylthio)benzothiazole.

BACKGROUND: In 2008, numerous cases of allergic contact dermatitis caused by leather chairs (sofa dermatitis) were reported, with dimethylfumarate being the culprit allergen. However, octylisothiazolinone, methylisothiazolinone and cobalt have also been associated with cases of sofa dermatitis. An antifungal agent, 2-(thiocyanomethylthio)benzothiazole (TCMTB), has also previously been described as a contact allergen in leather. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven patients were referred to the Department of Dermatology of the Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium with suspicion of allergic contact dermatitis caused by leather sofas. They were patch tested with the European Baseline Series, additional series (according to the patients' history and clinical aspect of the eruption), dimethylfumarate (4/7 patients) and with TCMTB. RESULTS: All seven patients presented a positive reaction to TCMTB and only one presented a concomitant positive reaction to dimethylfumarate. All patients showed clinical improvement after avoiding contact with their leather sofa. CONCLUSION: 2-(Thiocyanomethylthio)benzothiazole (TCMTB) is probably an underestimated allergen present in leather chairs (responsible for the so-called 'sofa dermatitis'), and more generally in leather objects. It is, therefore, important to test with TCMTB 0.1% petrolatum in case of contact dermatitis related with leather products.

Simple parameters from complete blood count predict lymphopenia, adverse effects and efficacy in people with MS treated with dimethyl fumarate.

BACKGROUND: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is a first-line oral therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). This retrospective study aims to determine the utility of routine complete blood counts (CBC) in predicting lymphopenia, adverse effects and efficacy in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: The Calgary Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Clinic manages over 1800 people with MS on disease-modifying therapies (DMT). Data of patients with relapsing-remitting MS (pwMS) who initiated DMF between July 1, 2013 and December 31, 2014 were included. Patients were followed for one year. DMT use is carefully monitored and pwMS need a screening CBC and have regular CBCs done at follow-up. Demographic, clinical, MRI and relapse information are collected prospectively in a clinic database. We analyzed CBCs at baseline and month 3. RESULTS: We identified 139 pwMS in the study period who started DMF. Median follow-up time on-drug was 12 (0.16-12) months. In our study, 15.8% of pwMS developed lymphopenia grade 2 or higher. Baseline lymphocyte counts and older age were significant predictors of lymphopenia. Higher baseline eosinophil counts predicted flushing/gastrointestinal adverse effects, and higher baseline monocyte counts were predictive of breakthrough disease activity. Neutrophil and platelet to lymphocyte ratios, markers that have been associated with overall mortality in the general population, were increased at month 3. CONCLUSIONS: Routinely obtained CBCs during the screening and monitoring of people with MS starting DMF offer clinically useful information and generate interesting hypotheses. Age and baseline lymphocyte counts are reinforced as clinically useful predictors of lymphopenia. Our novel findings that baseline eosinophil and monocyte counts could offer insights into usual adverse effects and efficacy, respectively, should be further investigated as a potentially new set of biomarkers.

Dietary habits of psoriatic patients treated with dimethyl fumarate and drug-related side effects: results from an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Despite its favorable long-term safety profile, side effects during dimethyl fumarate (DMF) treatment for psoriasis are not uncommon and may lead to treatment suspension. The association between side effects, especially gastrointestinal, and dietary habits has not yet been specifically addressed. METHODS: This observational, cross-sectional study aimed to assess the dietary habits of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in treatment with DMF who attended three Italian psoriasis clinics. Demographic and clinical data, including any side effects, were collected from the patients' medical records. A self-administered questionnaire recorded and scored: 1) if meals are eaten regularly or not; 2) daily intake at meals of fatty foods, milk and dairy products, alcohol, fruit and vegetables; and 3) in the case of side effects, the time between eating and their onset. RESULTS: We included 53 patients in treatment with DMF at a daily dose of 232.4±194.1 mg for 38±29.8 weeks. Thirty-eight (71.7%) reported side effects, namely flushing (60.5%), diarrhea (44.7%), gastralgia (29%) and nausea (15.8%). Overweight seemed associated with the occurrence of side effects. In 47.4% of subjects, side effects appeared within 2 hours of having a meal. Daily fat intake appeared to protect against side effects, albeit without statistical significance; skipping meals was correlated with their onset in subjects complaining of diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: Finding some correlation between dietary habits and occurrence of side effects during DMF treatment requires further investigation with the aim of developing possible strategies to improve its tolerability and retention rate.

Medication adherence and health outcomes in persons with multiple sclerosis treated with dimethyl fumarate.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system that particularly affects people in their 30s. Oral disease-modifying therapy (DMT) offers a simple dosage form, good efficacy and safety. Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is a frequently prescribed oral DMT medication worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of medication adherence on health outcomes in Slovenian persons with MS treated with DMF. METHODS: Our retrospective cohort study included persons with relapsing-remitting MS on DMF treatment. The medication adherence was evaluated by AdhereR software package using the proportion of days covered (PDC) measure. The threshold was set at 90%. Health outcomes after treatment initiation were represented by relapse occurrence, disability progression and occurrence of active (new T2 and T1/Gadolinium (Gd) enhancing) lesions between first two outpatient visits and first two brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), respectively. For each health outcome a separate multivariable regression model was built. RESULTS: The study included 164 patients. Their mean age (SD) was 36.7 (8.8) years, and the majority of patients were women (114 or 70%). Eighty-one patients were treatment naive. The mean (SD) PDC value was 0.942 (0.08) and 82% of patients were considered adherent above the 90% threshold. Older age (OR 1.06 per one year, P = 0.017, 95% CI (1.01-1.11)) and treatment naivety (OR 3.93, P = 0.004, 95% CI (1.64-10.4)) were related to higher adherence. In the 6-year follow-up period after DMF treatment initiation, 33 patients experienced a relapse. Among those, 19 required an emergency visit. Sixteen patients had a 1-point disability progression on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score between two consecutive outpatient visits. Thirty-seven patients were found to have active lesions between first and second brain MRI. Medication adherence showed no impact on relapse occurrence or disability progression. Lower medication adherence (10% lower PDC) was associated with higher occurrence of active lesions (OR 1.25, P=0.038, 95% CI: 1.01-1.56). Higher disability prior to DMF initiation was related to a higher risk for relapse occurrence and EDSS progression. CONCLUSION: Our study showed high medication adherence among Slovenian persons with relapse-remitting MS on DMF treatment. Higher adherence was associated with lower incidence of the radiological progression of MS. Interventions for improving medication adherence should be intended for younger patients with higher disability prior treatment with DMF and those switching from alternative DMTs.

Alopecia associated with dimethyl fumarate treatment for multiple sclerosis.

After 2 weeks of treatment, a woman with multiple sclerosis treated with dimethyl fumarate developed alopecia. Considering the adverse events, the therapy was discontinued, leading to alopecia regression during the next 3 months. Although the precise mechanism has not been completely elucidated, glutathione depletion or downregulation of aerobic glycolysis are considered to be potential reasons for hair loss induction. The incidence and mechanism of this uncommon adverse reaction to dimethyl fumarate should be further investigated.

Gut Microbiota Changes during Dimethyl Fumarate Treatment in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

The gut microbiota is involved in the development of the immune system and can modulate the risk for immune-mediated disorders such as multiple sclerosis (MS). Dysbiosis has been demonstrated in MS patients and its restoration by disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) is hypothesized. We aimed to study the changes in gut microbiota composition during the first 6 months of treatment with dimethyl fumarate (DMF), an oral DMT, and to identify the microorganisms associated with DMF side effects. We collected and analyzed the gut microbiota of 19 MS patients at baseline and after 1, 3, and 6 months of DMF treatment. We then cross-sectionally compared gut microbiota composition according to the presence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and flushing. Overall, the gut microbiota biodiversity showed no changes over the 6-month follow-up. At the genus level, DMF was associated with decreased Clostridium abundance after 6 months. In subjects reporting side effects, a higher abundance of Streptococcus, Haemophilus, Clostridium, Lachnospira, Blautia, Subdoligranulum, and Tenericutes and lower of Bacteroidetes, Barnesiella, Odoribacter, Akkermansia, and some Proteobacteria families were detected. Our results suggest that gut microbiota may be involved in therapeutic action and side effects of DMF, representing a potential target for improving disease course and DMT tolerability.

[Actual adherence to dimethyl fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis]. / Adhesión real al dimetilfumarato en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple remitente-recurrente.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic neurological disease with numerous disease-modifying treatments available, including dimethyl fumarate (DMF), a first-line therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Although rates of discontinuation of DMF are generally low in clinical trials, non-adherence to treatment is associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Assessing real-world adherence and predictive factors is critical to be able to improve clinical outcomes for patients. This study evaluated adherence to DMF over 24 months in a cohort of patients treated in a Portuguese healthcare centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, non-interventional, single-centre study with 24 months' follow-up was conducted. The study included adult patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with DMF in routine clinical practice. Adherence to DMF was calculated and patients were considered to have adhered if the value was above 80%. Clinical and socio-demographic variables were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of the 80 patients included, 74% were women, with a mean age of 39 years and a mean age of 32 years at diagnosis. Twenty-six patients had not received any previous treatment. Adherence varied between 93, 82 and 87.5% at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. No differences were found between patients who had not received any prior treatment and those who had been treated. CONCLUSION: This real-world analysis showed significant adherence to DMF treatment by Portuguese patients over a period of two years. However, these results must be interpreted in the light of the substantial changes in outpatient consultations and the various periodic restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which had an important effect on patient follow-up and data collection.

TITLE: Adhesión real al dimetilfumarato en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple remitente-recurrente.Introducción. La esclerosis múltiple es una enfermedad neurológica crónica con numerosos tratamientos modificadores de la enfermedad disponibles, incluido el dimetilfumarato (DMF), una terapia de primera línea para la esclerosis múltiple remitente-recurrente. Aunque las tasas de discontinuación del DMF suelen ser bajas en los ensayos clínicos, la falta de adhesión al tratamiento se asocia con peores resultados clínicos. Evaluar la adhesión en el mundo real y los factores predictivos es fundamental para mejorar los resultados clínicos de los pacientes. Este estudio evaluó la adhesión al DMF durante 24 meses en una cohorte de pacientes tratados en un centro portugués. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio prospectivo no intervencionista, de un solo centro, con un seguimiento de 24 meses. El estudio incluyó a pacientes adultos con esclerosis múltiple remitente-recurrente tratados con DMF en la práctica clínica habitual. Se calculó la adhesión al DMF y se consideró que los pacientes eran adherentes si el valor estaba por encima del 80%. Se compararon variables clínicas y sociodemográficas entre grupos. Resultados. De los 80 pacientes incluidos, el 74% eran mujeres, con una edad media de 39 años y una edad media en el momento del diagnóstico de 32 años. Veintiséis pacientes no habían recibido tratamiento previo. La adhesión varió entre el 93, el 82 y el 87,5% a los 6, 12 y 24 meses, respectivamente. No se encontraron diferencias entre los pacientes que no habían recibido tratamiento previo y los que sí lo habían recibido. Conclusión. Este análisis en el mundo real mostró una adhesión significativa al tratamiento con DMF durante dos años por parte de los pacientes portugueses. No obstante, estos resultados deben interpretarse considerando los cambios sustanciales en las consultas externas y las diversas restricciones periódicas debidas a la pandemia de COVID-19, que afectaron en gran medida al seguimiento de los pacientes y a la recopilación de datos.

Pregnancy outcomes after early fetal exposure to injectable first-line treatments, dimethyl fumarate, or natalizumab in Danish women with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Data on pregnancy outcomes following fetal exposure to disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) in women with multiple sclerosis (MS) are sparse although growing. METHODS: Data from the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry were linked with nationwide registries enabling an investigation of adverse pregnancy outcomes in newborns of women with MS following fetal exposure to injectable first-line treatments, dimethyl fumarate, glatiramer acetate, or natalizumab. Logistic regression models accounting for clustered data were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for individual and composite adverse outcomes after adjusting for relevant covariates. RESULTS: A total of 1009 DMD-exposed pregnancies were compared with 1073 DMD-unexposed pregnancies as well as 91,112 pregnancies from the general population. No association of an increased risk of any perinatal outcome was found when comparing newborns with fetal exposure with the general population, including preterm birth (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.86-1.64), small for gestational age (OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 0.92-2.07), spontaneous abortion (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.84-1.27), congenital malformation (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.68-1.45), low Apgar score (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.23-1.65), stillbirth (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.33-3.31), placenta complication (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.22-1.27), and any adverse event (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.93-1.30). Similar results were found when comparing DMD-exposed pregnancies with DMD-unexposed pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: We found no increased association of adverse pregnancy outcomes in newborns with fetal exposure to DMDs when compared with either DMD-unexposed pregnancies or the general population.